Introduction: The Quiet Crisis Behind Your Morning Brew
Picture your favorite neighborhood coffee shop. The one where the barista remembers your name. The one with the worn-in couches, the indie music playing softly, and that signature latte you can’t find anywhere else.
Now imagine it gone.
For thousands of coffee shops across America, this isn’t imagination. It’s reality. According to data cited in a recent research study, only 54% of small businesses opened in 2012 managed to stay alive for five years or more. Coffee shops, despite their cozy appeal, are not immune.
But here’s the question that keeps aspiring café owners awake at night: What do the survivors know that everyone else doesn’t?
That’s exactly what a team of researchers set out to discover. Their study, a qualitative multiple case study of five successful coffee shop owners in Arkansas, offers a fascinating glimpse into the marketing strategies that separate thriving coffee shops from those that fade away.
This article reviews that research, breaks down its findings in plain language, and explores what any small business owner can learn from these real-world success stories.
Discussion of the Study: How the Research Was Done
The researchers didn’t just crunch numbers or send out mass surveys. They wanted to hear directly from people who had done it – owners who had kept their independent coffee shops alive and thriving for more than five years.
They chose a qualitative multiple case study approach. In simple terms, that means they conducted in-depth, face-to-face interviews with five coffee shop owners in Arkansas. But they didn’t stop there. They also examined publicly available data, including the coffee shops’ websites and social media platforms, to verify what they were hearing.
Why only five owners? In qualitative research, depth matters more than breadth. The goal wasn’t to survey thousands of people. It was to get rich, detailed stories from people who had actually succeeded.
Each participant met one crucial criterion: they had successfully used marketing strategies to keep their coffee shop operating for more than five years.
The researchers used something called “purposive sampling” – meaning they deliberately chose owners who had deep understanding of the phenomenon they were studying. They weren’t looking for average owners or failing owners. They wanted winners.
The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using NVivo12™, a software program that helps researchers identify recurring words, phrases, and themes. They also used a technique called “member checking” – asking participants to review their interview summaries for accuracy – to ensure they hadn’t misinterpreted anything.
The theoretical framework guiding the research was something called the “8Ps of marketing mix,” developed by Goldsmith in 1999. You’re probably familiar with the traditional “4Ps” of marketing: Product, Price, Place, and Promotion. Later, marketers added three more: People, Physical Evidence, and Process. Goldsmith added an eighth: Personalization.
The researchers wanted to see whether these eight elements – particularly personalization – played a role in coffee shop survival.
Key Findings: The Eight Secrets of Surviving Coffee Shops
After analyzing all the data, the researchers identified eight distinct themes. Here’s what they found.
Theme 1: Business Operations – You Can’t Just Be an Owner. You Have to Be Present.
Every single participant – 100% of them – emphasized the importance of active, daily involvement in their business. This wasn’t about hiring a manager and disappearing. This was about being there, every day, working alongside employees.
One participant had been in business for over 20 years. Another described their coffee shop as a “family business” where employees were genuinely invested. The owners weren’t distant figures in corporate offices. They were behind the counter, making drinks, talking to customers, and solving problems in real time.
The researchers noted that customers perceive family-associated brands as more authentic. That authenticity translates into loyalty.
Theme 2: Community Involvement – The Third Place Concept
Four out of five owners (80%) were deeply engaged in their local communities. This wasn’t just about donating coffee to events. This was about something deeper: creating what sociologists call a “third place.”
Here’s what that means. Your first place is home. Your second place is work. A third place is somewhere else – a coffee shop, a library, a pub – where people gather, connect, and build relationships.
One owner described wanting to create “a community space where everybody would be welcomed.” Another said, “We want to serve the people we see every day. Then you know what they’re going through. We know their kids.”
This wasn’t marketing as transaction. This was marketing as relationship. And it worked.
One owner even noted that community organizations actively sought out his coffee shop for donations. His brand had become synonymous with community generosity.
Theme 3: Premium Products – Quality That Rivals the Chains
Every single owner emphasized the importance of premium products. This wasn’t about being cheap. It was about being unmistakably good.
Several owners roasted their own coffee beans in-house. They made their own syrups from scratch. They baked their own pastries, scones, cookies, and muffins. One owner made everything by hand – bagels, sandwiches, even the bread.
The researchers found that the most important coffee product features included taste, flavor, roasting point, and brew methods. The rich taste of coffee was the most notable factor for customer satisfaction.
What’s interesting is that these owners weren’t afraid of national chains like Starbucks. They believed their quality was simply better. And their customers agreed.
Theme 4: Social Media for Marketing, Promotion, and Branding – Word of Mouth Meets the Digital Age
All five owners used social media, but their journeys varied. Initially, most relied on traditional word-of-mouth advertising. Over time, they transitioned to Facebook and Instagram.
One owner admitted that transitioning from word-of-mouth to social media was a significant challenge. Another hired an “Instagram expert” to help. A third revamped their website for search engine optimization and hired a dedicated marketing person.
What’s striking is that the owners didn’t abandon their old methods. They created hybrids. They used Facebook and Instagram to amplify the word-of-mouth recommendations that had always driven their businesses.
One owner even received awards for having the best Instagram photos. Social media wasn’t just a tool. It became part of their brand identity.
Theme 5: Competitive Pricing – Fair, Not Cheap
All five owners recommended competitive pricing strategies. But here’s the nuance: they weren’t trying to be the cheapest option.
One owner described their pricing as “not cheap but not overly pricey.” Another said they were “50-70 cents cheaper than the national brands” while offering superior quality. A third owner took a different approach entirely: premium product at a premium price.
“I could sell my coffee for less,” one owner explained, “but then I have devalued my product.”
The key was sustainability. Prices had to cover costs, allow for reasonable profits, and reflect the quality customers were receiving.
Theme 6: Location – Where You Set Up Matters More Than You Think
Every owner agreed that location was essential. But here’s what made their approach different: they weren’t just looking for high traffic. They were looking for community.
Most of the coffee shops were located in business districts or downtown areas. One had the added advantage of being near a university. But the owners consistently emphasized that location wasn’t just about visibility. It was about belonging.
One owner deliberately chose a downtown location because “downtown is where the heart is.” Another considered community dynamics and parking availability before making a decision.
The physical space also mattered. Owners wanted their interiors to feel different from national chains. One owner had multiple locations, each with a different ambiance. “We serve the same drinks at each location,” he explained, “but the atmosphere is different.”
Theme 7: Customer Service and Personalization – The Non-Negotiable
Every single owner emphasized that superior customer service wasn’t optional. It was the foundation of everything else.
One owner described creating “a culture of customer service.” Another noted that owners themselves were often behind the counter, talking to people. A third made a deliberate choice: paying and non-paying customers could sit in the coffee shop and enjoy free Wi-Fi for extended periods.
“We never want to be transactional,” one owner explained. “I want it to be about the experience.”
This is where Goldsmith’s eighth P – Personalization – came to life. Owners knew customers by name. They remembered preferences. They created environments where people felt seen, not just served.
Theme 8: Points of Marketing Differentiation – Standing Out in a Crowded Field
Finally, every owner emphasized the need for differentiation. Great product, fair price, and good location weren’t enough. They needed something that competitors couldn’t easily copy.
For these owners, differentiation came from unexpected places.
One owner marketed branded clothing and apparel. Another emphasized a laidback, innovative approach. A third relied heavily on a drive-through window – 80% of their business came from that single point of difference.
One owner had a striking policy: “When we make mistakes, we own it and make it right for the customer. If it’s a significant error, we will not charge the customer.”
Another was creating private label coffee blends sold exclusively to mid-to-upscale restaurants.
The researchers noted that effective marketing strategies contributed directly to attracting customers and building loyalty. But differentiation wasn’t about being different for the sake of being different. It was about being authentically, unmistakably themselves.
The Surprising Finding: National Chains Aren’t the Real Threat
Here’s something that might surprise you. Despite the dominance of Starbucks and other national chains, the coffee shop owners in this study didn’t view them as their primary threat.
Why? Because they had built something the chains couldn’t replicate: genuine community connection.
National chains have scale. They have massive marketing budgets. They have loyalty apps and national supply chains. But they can’t be part of a local neighborhood in the same way an independent owner can.
One owner explained it simply: “We are a family business. A lot of the customers are our neighbors and friends.”
Another said, “It never personally made sense to us to open in another town because we do not know that community.”
This is a powerful insight. For independent coffee shop owners, the competitive advantage isn’t just about better coffee or lower prices. It’s about belonging. And belonging can’t be franchised.
The Challenges They Faced: It Wasn’t Easy
The researchers also asked owners about their biggest challenges. Their answers were revealing.
The most common challenge was learning the ropes of business operation while simultaneously implementing marketing strategies. One owner described opening a coffee shop in a downtown area that had “no downtown culture or coffee culture at all.” Getting people to come downtown was a struggle.
Another owner admitted that understanding how to use social media platforms – and combining social media with traditional word-of-mouth marketing – was a steep learning curve.
A third owner faced the challenge of creating awareness after a change in ownership. Customers who loved the previous owner weren’t sure whether to trust the new one.
These challenges weren’t insurmountable. But they required persistence, learning, and a willingness to adapt.
The Conceptual Framework: How the 8Ps of Marketing Mix Applied
The researchers mapped each interview question to Goldsmith’s 8Ps framework. Here’s how it lined up:
| Interview Focus | 8Ps Component |
|---|---|
| Business operations | Processes, People, Promotion |
| Key challenges | Processes, Physical Evidence, Promotion |
| Addressing challenges | People |
| Increasing customer base | Promotion |
| Pricing strategy | Price |
| Location | Place |
| Media effectiveness | Promotion |
| Points of differentiation | Personalization, Product, Promotion, People |
| Merchandising | Promotion, Personalization, Pricing |
| Superior service examples | Personalization |
| Additional strategies | Personalization, People, Promotion |
What this table reveals is that successful coffee shop owners weren’t using just one or two marketing tools. They were using an integrated mix of strategies, with a heavy emphasis on people, personalization, and promotion.
Limitations: What the Study Doesn’t Tell Us
No research is perfect, and the researchers were honest about their study’s limits.
Small sample size. Five owners in one state. That’s not enough to generalize to all coffee shops across America. What works in Arkansas might not work in Manhattan or San Francisco.
Geographic restriction. Only Arkansas. The findings might not transfer to other regions with different demographics, economies, or coffee cultures.
Exclusion of failed owners. The study only interviewed successful owners. That means we don’t know what failing owners were doing differently. Perhaps they were using the same strategies but executing poorly. Perhaps they faced insurmountable external challenges. We can’t know.
Self-reporting bias. Owners might have described their strategies in ways that made them look good, consciously or unconsciously.
Industry specific. The findings apply to coffee shops. They might not apply to other small businesses like restaurants, retail stores, or service providers.
The researchers themselves recommend future studies that examine:
- How coffee shop owners can remain relevant as communities change
- How to overcome social media adoption challenges
- How to improve frontline employee engagement and service consistency
- Whether findings are transferable to other geographical areas
Real-World Impact: Why This Research Matters
For the average person grabbing a morning latte, this research might seem academic. But the implications are genuinely practical.
For coffee shop owners and aspiring owners:
The study offers a roadmap. Don’t just open a coffee shop – embed yourself in a community. Don’t just serve coffee – serve relationships. Don’t just post on social media – use it to amplify the word-of-mouth that has always driven your business.
For employees:
The research validates what many workers already know. Customers can tell when you genuinely care versus when you’re just going through the motions. Training matters. Leadership matters. The emotional connection you build with customers matters.
For communities:
Coffee shops aren’t just businesses. They’re third places – gathering spots where people connect, where relationships form, where neighborhoods cohere. Supporting local coffee shops isn’t just economic development. It’s community development.
For policymakers:
The study highlights the vulnerability of small businesses in an era of chain dominance. Programs that support local business marketing, technology adoption, and workforce training aren’t just economic policy. They’re community preservation.
The 8Ps of Marketing Mix for Coffee Shop Owners: A Practical Model
Based on their findings, the researchers created a practical model for coffee shop owners. The model includes eight components:
- Product – Premium coffee and artisan products
- Price – Competitive but sustainable pricing
- Place – Strategic location with community connection
- Promotion – Word-of-mouth amplified by social media
- People – Active owner involvement and well-trained staff
- Physical Evidence – Inviting, distinctive atmosphere
- Process – Efficient, customer-friendly operations
- Personalization – Knowing customers by name and preference
The researchers emphasize that these components don’t work in isolation. They work together. An owner who has great product and fair price but poor customer service will struggle. An owner who has great service but poor location will struggle.
Success comes from integrating all eight elements.
Implications for Social Change: Beyond Profits
The researchers didn’t just focus on business success. They also considered social change.
When coffee shops survive and thrive, they create jobs. Jobs provide income, dignity, and stability. When employees earn reliable wages, they spend money in their communities. They pay taxes. They send their kids to local schools.
The researchers argue that helping coffee shop owners succeed isn’t just about helping business owners. It’s about helping entire communities.
Positive social change, they write, includes “sustained employment of coffee shop employees in Arkansas, which can improve self-worth and human dignity.” It includes “building stronger communities through gainful employment.”
This is a reminder that small businesses aren’t just economic units. They’re social institutions. When they fail, communities don’t just lose a place to buy coffee. They lose a gathering space, an employer, a neighborhood anchor.
Conclusion: What the Five Owners Taught Us
The purpose of this study was straightforward: explore what marketing strategies coffee shop owners use to survive beyond their first five years.
The answer turned out to be more nuanced than a simple checklist.
Successful owners were actively engaged in daily operations – not distant figureheads. They were deeply embedded in their communities – not just selling to them. They offered premium products that rivaled or exceeded national chains. They used social media to amplify traditional word-of-mouth marketing. They priced competitively but fairly. They chose locations strategically but also soulfully. They treated customer service and personalization as non-negotiables. And they developed points of marketing differentiation that competitors couldn’t easily copy.
Perhaps most important, they didn’t view national chains as their primary threat. They had built something the chains couldn’t replicate: genuine community connection, authentic relationships, and a third place that felt like home.
The researchers concluded that the marketing strategies identified in their findings “provided solutions that owners of coffee shop owners and their stakeholders can use to grow and sustain their business.”
For anyone dreaming of opening a coffee shop – or struggling to keep one alive – that’s a valuable conclusion.
The secret isn’t just in the beans. It’s in the community, the relationships, the daily presence, and the authentic connection that no chain can franchise.
And that’s something worth remembering, whether you’re an owner, an employee, or just someone who loves a good cup of coffee in a place that feels like home.
About the Original Paper
This article reviews a qualitative multiple case study on marketing strategies used by successful coffee shop owners in Arkansas. The original research was grounded in Goldsmith’s 8Ps of marketing mix theory and involved semistructured interviews with five coffee shop owners who had sustained operations beyond five years. Key supporting research cited includes work by Hyder and Lussier (2016) on small business success and failure, Alford and Page (2015) on marketing technology adoption, and Utami, Bayani, and Eprilisant (2018) on service quality and customer loyalty.
References:
[1] Hyder, S. and Lussier, R.N. (2016). Understanding the factors that determine small business success and failure in Pakistan. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 8, 82-100.
[2] Fang He, V., Sirén, C., Singh, S., Solomon, G. and von Krogh, G. (2018). How entrepreneurs regulate their emotions when learning from business failure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2018, 12273.
[3] Hsu, D.K., Wiklund, J. and Cotton, R.D. (2017). An experimental study of entrepreneurial reentry after failure using self-efficacy and prospect theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41, 19-47.
[4] Alford, P. and Page, S.J. (2015). How small businesses adopt and implement marketing technology. The Service Industries Journal, 35, 655-669.
[5] Lotfizadeh, F. and Shamsi, N. (2015). Identifying the key factors influencing small and medium enterprise performance in Iran. International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics, 2, 254-264. https://www.ijmae.com
[6] Nguyen, T.H., Newby, M. and Macaulay, M.J. (2015). Validating a framework for understanding information technology adoption in small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 53, 207-227.
[7] Small Business Administration (SBA) Office of Advocacy (2017). Arkansas small business economic profile for 2017. https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/advocacy/Arkansas_1.pdf
[8] United States Census Bureau (2016). Annual business data tables by establishment industry for 2014. https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2014/econ/susb/2014-susb-annual.html
[9] U.S. Census Bureau (2017). NAICS code 722515 definition: Snack and nonalcoholic beverage bars. https://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/sssd/naics/naicsrch
[10] Knoema (2016). Historical data on Starbucks store count worldwide from 1992 to 2016. https://knoema.com/kchdsge/number-of-starbucks-stores-
[11] Resnick, S.M., Cheng, R., Simpson, M. and Lourenco, F. (2016). A self-branding model using the 4Ps framework for marketing in small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 22, 155-174.
[12] Muhammad, A. and Lee, S.P. (2015). What influences customer preferences when choosing a coffee shop in South Korea. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 24, 252-265. http://gssrr.org/index.php?journal=JournalOfBasicAndApplied&page=index
[13] Bureau of Labor Statistics (2016). Survival rates of private sector businesses based on year of opening. http://www.bls.gov/bdm/us_age_naics_72_table7.txt
[14] Marshall, C. and Rossman, G.B. (2016). Designing qualitative research: A comprehensive guide (6th ed.). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
[15] Arbussa, A., Bikfalvi, A. and Marquès, P. (2017). How strategic agility drives business model renewal in small and medium enterprises. Management Decision, 55, 271-293.
[16] Yin, R.K. (2017). Case study research: Design and methodological approaches (6th ed.). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
[17] Bloomberg, L.D. and Volpe, M. (2018). A practical roadmap for completing qualitative dissertation research (4th ed.). Sage, Los Angeles, CA.
[18] Snelson, C.L. (2016). A literature review of qualitative and mixed methods approaches to social media research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15, 1-15.
[19] Mukherjee, S. and Shivani, S. (2016). How the marketing mix influences service brand equity and its various dimensions. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 20, 9-23.
[20] Goldsmith, R.E. (1999). Moving beyond the traditional 4Ps toward personalized marketing in the digital marketplace. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 17, 178-185.
[21] McCarthy, E.J. (1960). Foundations of basic marketing principles. Richard D. Lewin, Chicago, IL.
[22] Booms, B.H. and Bitner, B.J. (1981). Marketing strategy and organizational structure considerations for service-based firms. In Donnelly, J.H. and George, W.R., Eds., Marketing of Services (pp. 47-51). American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL.
[23] Pomering, A. (2017). Expanding the marketing mix framework to promote sustainability and create value for both individuals and society. Australasian Marketing Journal, 25, 157-165.
[24] Small Business Administration (SBA) (2018). Recent trends and developments in the small business sector. https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/Whats-New-With-Small-Business-2018.pdf
[25] Guzman, J.B. and Lussier, R.N. (2015). Key success factors for small businesses operating in Guanajuato, Mexico. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 6, 1-7. http://ijbssnet.com/
[26] Memili, E., Fang, H., Chrisman, J. and Massis, A. (2015). The contribution of small and medium-sized family firms to economic growth. Small Business Economics, 45, 771-785.
[27] Borden, N.H. (1964). Defining and explaining the marketing mix concept. Journal of Advertising Research, 4, 2-7. http://www.jar.warc.com
[28] Culliton, J.W. (1948). Analyzing and managing marketing costs effectively. Harvard University, Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Boston, MA.
[29] Mutandwa, E., Taremwa, N.K. and Tubanambazi, T. (2015). Factors that determine business performance in Rwandan small and medium enterprises. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 20, 1-12.
[30] Hidayanti, I., Herman, L.E. and Farida, N. (2018). Using social media engagement to enhance industrial product development through customer co-creation. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 17, 17-28.
[31] Zhang, M., Kim, P.B. and Goodsir, W. (2019). How service experience attributes shape customer attitudes and behaviors in New Zealand’s café industry. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 28, 28-50.
[32] Utami, T.I., Bayani, I. and Eprilisanti, A. (2018). The role of service quality in building loyalty among coffee consumers. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research, 9, 259-25987.
[33] Marek, P. (2014). A critical examination of marketing strategy concepts for small and medium-sized enterprises. Economics, Management & Financial Markets, 9, 255-261. http://www.addletonacademicpublishers.com/economics-management-and-financial-markets
[34] Park, J. and Park, M. (2016). Comparing qualitative and quantitative research methods: Discovery versus justification approaches. Journal of Marketing Thought, 3, 1-7.
[35] Dresch, A., Lacerda, D. and Cauchick Miguel, P. (2015). Distinguishing between case study, action research, and design science research methodologies. RBGN-Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 17, 1116-1133.
[36] Gaya, H.J. and Smith, E.E. (2016). Evaluating the appropriateness of qualitative single case study design for strategic management research. International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research, 7, 529-538. http://www.ijbmer.com
[37] Noble, H. and Smith, J. (2015). Addressing validity and reliability concerns in qualitative research studies. Evidence Based Nursing, 18, 34-35.
[38] Gentles, S.J., Charles, C., Ploeg, J. and McKibbon, K. (2015). Key insights from a methodological overview of sampling practices in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20, 1772-1789. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol20/iss11/5
[39] Fletcher, D., Massis, A.D. and Nordqvist, M. (2016). A review of qualitative research practices in family business scholarship with recommendations for future studies. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7, 8-25.
[40] Parveen, F., Jaafar, N.I. and Ainin, S. (2015). Perspectives and experiences of social media managers in Malaysia. Telematics and Informatics, 32, 67-78.
[41] Fusch, P.I. and Ness, L.R. (2015). Determining when data saturation has been achieved in qualitative research. Qualitative Report, 20, 1408-1416. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/
[42] Clark, K.R. and Vealé, B.L. (2018). Methods for improving data collection and analysis in qualitative research. Radiologic Technology, 89, 482-485. http://www.radiologictechnology.org
[43] Gudkova, S. (2017). Conducting interviews as a qualitative research method. In Qualitative Methodologies in Organization Studies, Volume 2 (pp. 75-96). Springer International Publishing, Berlin.
[44] Parsa, H.G., van der Rest, J.I., Smith, S.R., Parsa, R.A. and Bujisic, M. (2015). Part IV of restaurant failure research: The connection between demographic factors and business closure. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 56, 80-90.
[45] Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C. and Walter, F. (2016). Does member checking genuinely enhance trustworthiness or merely serve as a procedural requirement? Qualitative Health Research, 26, 1802-1811.
[46] Silverman, D. (2017). Examining the interview society and the growing dominance of poorly analyzed interview data. Qualitative Research, 17, 144-158.
[47] Sutton, J. and Austin, Z. (2015). Best practices for data collection, analysis, and management in qualitative research. The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 68, 226-231.
[48] Bengtsson, M. (2016). A practical guide to planning and executing qualitative studies using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8-14.
[49] Heesen, R., Bright, L.K. and Zucker, A. (2016). Defending the use of methodological triangulation in social science research. In Synthese (pp. 1-15). Springer, Netherlands.
[50] Taylor, S.J., Bogdan, R. and DeVault, M. (2015). An introductory guide to qualitative research methods and resources (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, London, UK.
[51] Hussein, A. (2015). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods through triangulation in social science research. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 4, 1-12. http://journal.uia.no/index.php/JCSW
[52] Graue, C. (2015). Approaches to analyzing qualitative data effectively. International Journal of Sales, Retailing and Marketing, 4, 5-14. http://www.ijsrm.com
[53] Mayer, I. (2015). Focusing on qualitative data analysis techniques in research methodology. International Journal of Sales, Retailing and Marketing, 4, 57-67. http://ijsrm.com
[54] Cayir, M.Y. and Saritas, M.T. (2017). A descriptive content analysis of computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software use. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 518-544. http://www.nef.balikesir.edu.tr/~dergi/
[55] Chowdhury, M.F. (2015). Debates and discussions surrounding coding, sorting, and sifting in qualitative data analysis. Quality and Quantity, 49, 1135-1143.
[56] Leung, L. (2015). Understanding validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 4, 324-327.
[57] Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). A framework for refining interview protocols in preparation for qualitative research. Qualitative Report, 21, 811-830. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/
[58] Morse, J.M. (2015). A critical assessment of strategies used to determine rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 25, 1212-1222.
[59] Abbaszadeh, M. and Abbaszadeh, M. (2016). Examining validity and reliability standards in qualitative research studies. Journal of Applied Sociology, 23, 19-34.
[60] Cypress, B.S. (2017). Understanding rigor, reliability, and validity in qualitative research design. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 36, 253-263.
[61] Lude, M. and Prügl, R. (2018). Why authenticity matters for family business brands and how it builds consumer trust. Journal of Business Research, 89, 121-134.
[62] Hargis, M.B. and Bradley, D.B. (2011). Aligning valuable human resources with strategic goals in small and growing firms. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 10, 105-125. http://www.thecasecentre.org
[63] Popescu, C.C. (2018). Enhancing business operations and customer experience through data science and artificial intelligence applications. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 12, 804-815.
[64] Huete-Alcocer, N. (2017). A review of traditional word-of-mouth and electronic word-of-mouth literature and their effects on consumer behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-4.
[65] Kujur, F. and Singh, S. (2016). How social media serves as a tool for implementing marketing strategies. International Journal of Economic Research, 13, 373-381. http://www.ijeronline.com/
[66] Xie, H., Li, X., Wang, T., Chen, L., Li, K., Wang, F.L. and Min, H. (2016). Using dominating verbal context to improve personalized search on social media platforms. Neurocomputing, 172, 27-37.
[67] Rajasekaran, R. (2015). Analyzing Starbucks market entry strategy into tea-consuming India. IUP Journal of Brand Management, 12, 45-58. http://www.iupindia.in/Brand_Management.asp
[68] Situmorang, S.H., Mulyono, H. and Azmi, A. (2018). The influence of servicescape and customer experience on social location marketing in Medan cafés. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 46, 546-552.
[69] Porter, M.E. (1980). Frameworks for analyzing competitive strategy. Free Press, New York.
[70] Zeriti, A., Robson, M.J., Spyropoulou, S. and Leonidou, C.N. (2014). The alignment between sustainable export marketing strategy and business performance. Journal of International Marketing, 22, 44-66.
[71] Ogbuji, B. and Papazafeiropoulou, A. (2016). A comprehensive framework for developing social media strategies in organizations. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9844, 3-14.
[72] Van der Merwe, K. and Maree, T. (2016). Understanding the behavioral intentions of specialty coffee consumers in South Africa. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40, 501-508.
[73] Stephan, U., Patterson, M., Kelly, C. and Mair, J. (2016). A review and integrative framework of how organizations drive positive social change. Journal of Management, 42, 1250-1281.
[74] Yuen, F. and Johnson, A.J. (2016). Examining the relationship between leisure spaces, community building, and third places. Leisure Sciences, 39, 295-303.
[75] Chua, A.P.H., Deans, K.R. and Parker, C.M. (2015). Identifying which types of small and medium enterprises can benefit from using blogs as marketing tools. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 16, 561.
[76] Stock, R.M., de Jong, A. and Zacharias, N.A. (2016). How frontline employees’ innovative service behavior drives customer loyalty through resource gains. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34, 223-245.
