Introduction: The Quiet Crisis Behind Your Favorite Local Eatery
Imagine walking into a small, family-owned burger joint. The owner knows your name. The fries are always perfectly crispy. It feels like it’s been there forever.
But here’s a sobering truth: most places like this don’t last.
According to government data cited in a recent study, over 77% of new small businesses survive their first year. But that number drops dramatically. Less than 65% make it past five years. For independent restaurants—especially quick-service ones where you order at a counter—the odds are even worse.
In Little Rock, Arkansas alone, more than 100 independent quick-service restaurants close or become inactive every single year.
So what separates the ones that survive from the ones that shut down?
That’s exactly what researcher Mario D. Wallace set out to discover. His 2019 study, grounded in resource-based theory, offers a fascinating glimpse into the minds and strategies of six restaurant owners who beat the odds.
This article reviews Wallace’s work, breaks down his findings in plain language, and explores what any small business owner can learn from these real-world success stories.
Discussion of the Study: How the Research Was Done
Wallace didn’t just crunch numbers or send out surveys. He wanted to hear directly from people who had done it—owners who had kept their independent quick-service restaurants alive and thriving for more than five years.
He chose a qualitative multiple case study approach. That’s a fancy way of saying he conducted in-depth, face-to-face interviews with six owners in Little Rock, Arkansas. He also collected business documents like menus, job descriptions, websites, and social media pages to verify what he was hearing.
Why only six people? In qualitative research, depth matters more than breadth. Wallace wasn’t trying to survey thousands. He wanted rich, detailed stories. He kept interviewing until he reached what researchers call “data saturation”—the point where new interviews stopped revealing new information.
Each participant met three criteria:
- They owned an independent quick-service restaurant (no franchises)
- The business had operated continuously in Little Rock for more than five years
- They fit the U.S. Census definition of a quick-service restaurant (counter order, eat-in or takeout)
Wallace recorded every interview, transcribed them using both artificial intelligence software and his own careful editing, then analyzed the transcripts using specialized qualitative analysis software called Atlas.ti. He also used a technique called member checking—asking participants to review their interview summaries for accuracy—to ensure he hadn’t misinterpreted anything.
The result? Six clear themes that explained why these businesses survived.
Key Findings: The Six Pillars of Restaurant Survival
After crunching all the data, Wallace discovered that successful owners focused on six key areas. He organized these into a memorable framework:
1. Organization Value (Business Smarts and Secret Weapons)
The owners who succeeded weren’t just cooks who happened to open a restaurant. They had genuine business acumen—transferable knowledge from previous careers or education. They understood how to turn limited information into smart decisions.
But here’s something interesting: every single successful owner had what Wallace calls “intellectual properties.” Secret sauces. Special recipes. Unique flavor combinations that customers couldn’t get anywhere else.
One owner had a secret sauce he created himself and never shared. Another had employees who had worked for over 20 years and signed contracts giving the restaurant rights to their recipes. These weren’t just tasty condiments—they were legal and strategic assets that competitors couldn’t copy.
2. Customer Required Excellence (Knowing Who You’re Serving)
The owners didn’t treat all customers the same. They actively thought about three groups:
- New customers they wanted to attract
- Regulars they needed to keep happy
- Non-customers they hoped to convert
Successful owners learned names. They recognized faces. They engaged with online reviews on platforms like Yelp. They understood that relationships—both offline and digital—were assets just as valuable as their fryers and freezers.
3. Financial Perspective (Money Smarts)
Here’s where things get practical. Surviving owners didn’t just hope for the best financially. They:
- Used personal savings to start (no surprise there)
- Organized investments from friends and family
- Built credit scores above 700 to qualify for business loans
- Created multiple revenue streams beyond counter sales—catering, wholesale to other businesses, and private label products
One size didn’t fit all, but every successful owner had a deliberate financial strategy. They didn’t leave money to chance.
4. Human Assets (People Power)
Wallace discovered something counterintuitive. You might think that in a quick-service restaurant, employees are easily replaceable. Not in successful ones.
The best owners were what Wallace calls “owner-leaders.” They worked alongside their staff. They could do every job in the restaurant—cooking, cleaning, taking orders, managing the register. They weren’t bosses hiding in an office.
They also paid above-market wages. Several owners had employees who had stayed for over a decade. One owner paid 30% above the local average. That investment in people paid back through loyalty, consistency, and tacit knowledge that walked in the door every morning and didn’t walk out.
5. Physical Operating Materials (Location and Equipment)
This one might seem obvious, but Wallace found nuance. Successful restaurants weren’t just anywhere. They were strategically located in areas with good visibility and foot traffic.
But physical capital wasn’t just about location. It included the look and feel of the restaurant. The equipment. Even the raw ingredients. Customers could tell when food started from fresh, raw ingredients rather than frozen or pre-packaged options.
6. Technological Prowess (The Surprising Weakness)
Here’s where Wallace found a genuine surprise. Despite living in the digital age, most of his successful owners were technological novices.
They had basic social media accounts but didn’t really know how to use them effectively. They had simple point-of-sale systems but weren’t leveraging data. One owner ran a one-person operation where employees never learned to use the credit card machine properly.
According to Wallace’s analysis using the VRIN framework (which stands for Valuable, Rare, Imperfectly Imitable, and Non-substitutable), these owners’ technological resources offered no sustained competitive advantage. In plain English: their tech skills weren’t helping them win.
Wallace argues this is actually an opportunity. The owners who do figure out technology—who learn to mine customer data, engage on social media, and use online ordering effectively—could gain an edge that competitors can’t easily copy.
The Big Picture: Why These Six Themes Matter
Wallace didn’t just list themes. He connected them to an established business theory called the Resource-Based View (RBT), originally developed by researcher Jay Barney in 1991.
The core idea of RBT is simple: Some companies outperform others not because of industry conditions or luck, but because they have internal resources that competitors can’t easily copy.
Think about it. A competitor can buy the same fryer as you. They can rent space on the same street. They can even try to copy your menu. But they can’t copy your secret sauce recipe that employees have perfected over 20 years. They can’t instantly replicate the relationship you’ve built with regular customers who eat lunch at your counter every Tuesday.
These are what Wallace calls “socially complex” and “causally ambiguous” resources. They’re hard to understand from the outside and even harder to duplicate.
Based on his findings, Wallace created something he calls the Independent Quick-Service Restaurant Integrated Social Complexity and Casual Ambiguity Model (or ISC model for short—much easier to say).
Think of this model as a two-layer cake:
The bottom layer (crust): Financial perspective, physical assets, and organization value. These are foundational. Without them, nothing else works.
The top layer (slab): Human assets, customer excellence, and technology. These sit on top of the foundation.
The magic happens when owners figure out how to connect the layers—how to use their financial stability to train employees better, how to use customer relationships to gather feedback that improves their secret recipes. These connections create complexity that competitors can’t easily untangle.
Wallace emphasizes that there’s no single perfect formula. Each owner must experiment through trial and error to find the right linkages for their specific business context.
Limitations: What the Study Doesn’t Tell Us
No research is perfect, and Wallace is refreshingly honest about his study’s limits.
Small sample size. Six owners in one city. That’s not enough to generalize to all independent restaurants across America. What works in Little Rock might not work in Los Angeles or rural Montana.
Limited ethnic and gender focus. The study didn’t specifically examine whether strategies differ by ethnicity or gender. Given that minority women business owners often face unique financial challenges, this is a significant gap.
Geographic restriction. Only Little Rock. Surrounding states like Tennessee or Texas might reveal different survival strategies.
No focus on dietary trends. Consumer preferences are shifting toward healthier options. Obesity, hypertension, and high cholesterol concerns are real. This study didn’t deeply explore how successful owners respond to that threat.
Technology gap. Since most participants were technological novices, the study didn’t fully explore how advanced technology use might create competitive advantage. That’s a missed opportunity.
Wallace himself recommends future research with larger populations, specific ethnic or gender groups, broader geographic regions, and even different research methods like quantitative surveys or ethnographic observation.
Real-World Impact: Why This Matters Beyond Academia
You might be thinking: “This is interesting, but does it actually help anyone?”
Wallace argues yes—for several groups.
For restaurant owners: The study provides a practical checklist. Are you leveraging all six themes? Do you have intellectual property that competitors can’t copy? Are you building genuine customer relationships? Are you paying enough to retain great employees? If not, here’s your roadmap.
For local economies: Independent restaurants create jobs. In Arkansas alone, quick-service restaurants employ over 46,000 people. When these businesses close, those jobs disappear. Strategies that increase survival rates directly support local families.
For communities: Successful restaurants contribute to what Wallace calls “positive social change.” They create stable employment. They develop human capital through training. They anchor neighborhood commercial districts. A single restaurant that stays open for 20 years instead of 2 years transforms its community.
For aspiring entrepreneurs: The study offers a reality check. Opening a restaurant isn’t just about loving food. It requires business acumen, financial planning, people management, and strategic thinking about resources you might not even realize you have.
One finding that stands out: owners with college degrees seemed to have an edge (three of the six had degrees), but it wasn’t a requirement. Experience and iterative learning mattered just as much.
Conclusion: What the Six Owners Teach Us
Wallace’s study reminds us of something easy to forget. Behind every small restaurant that survives for decades, there’s not just good food. There’s strategic thinking.
The owners who beat the odds didn’t have massive budgets or corporate backing. They had limited resources. But they knew how to bundle those resources together in unique ways.
They turned secret recipes into legal assets. They turned customer relationships into competitive moats. They turned employee loyalty into operational stability. And some of them—the ones who will likely thrive in the coming decade—are starting to figure out technology.
If you’re a restaurant owner reading this, ask yourself: Are you treating your internal resources as carefully as you treat your ingredients?
If you’re an aspiring entrepreneur: Don’t open a restaurant just because you love to cook. Open one because you’re ready to be an owner-leader, a financial strategist, a relationship-builder, and—eventually—a tech-savvy operator.
The six owners in Little Rock didn’t succeed by accident. They succeeded by design. Their strategies won’t work for everyone in every situation. But they offer a powerful starting point for anyone willing to learn.
And in an industry where most places close within five years, that kind of learning might be the difference between flipping burgers and building a legacy.
About the Original Study
Wallace, M. D. (2019). Strategies for Sustaining Independent Quick-Service Restaurants Beyond Five Years. Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Business Administration. (Note: The original paper was provided in full by the user and reviewed for this article. The study is grounded in resource-based theory and uses qualitative multiple case study methodology.)
Final Thoughts
This review aimed to translate Wallace’s academic research into plain, useful English. The original study contains much more detail—statistical tables, interview protocols, coding trees, and extensive literature reviews. But the core message is simple:
Independent restaurants can survive. They do it by leveraging internal resources that competitors can’t easily copy. Those resources fall into six categories. Smart owners learn to bundle them together in unique, hard-to-replicate ways.
Whether you’re running a taco truck, a burger joint, or a sandwich shop, that’s a lesson worth remembering.
References:
[1] Agnihotri, A. (2016). Expanding the applications of Blue Ocean Strategy. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24, 519-528.
[2] Ahmed, S. P., & Ahmed, M. T. Z. (2014). The role of qualitative research in epistemological and ontological discussions. Journal of Studies in Social Sciences, 8, 298-313. http://www.infinitypress.info/index.php/jsss/index
[3] Akcigit, U., & Kerr, W. R. (2018). How different types of innovation drive economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 126, 1374-1443.
[4] Akkermans, H. A., & Van Oorschot, K. E. (2018). A case study examining balanced scorecard development through system dynamics. In M. Kunc (Ed.), System Dynamics (pp. 107-132). Palgrave Macmillan.
[5] Al Mamun, C., & Hasan, N. (2017). Causes of employee turnover and effective retention strategies: A conceptual framework. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15, 63-71.
[6] Anney, N. V. (2014). Establishing trustworthiness in qualitative research findings. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 5, 272-281.
[7] Barney, J. B. (1991). How firm-specific resources create lasting competitive advantages. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
[8] Barnham, C. (2015). Comparing the perceptual foundations of quantitative and qualitative research. International Journal of Market Research, 57, 837-854.
[9] Baskarada, S. (2014). Best practices for conducting qualitative case studies. Qualitative Report, 19, 1-25.
[10] Benoot, C., Hannes, K., & Bilsen, J. (2016). Applying purposeful sampling in qualitative evidence synthesis: An example from cancer-related sexual adjustment research. BioMed Central Medical Research Methodology, 16, Article No. 21.
[11] Bernard, H. (2013). Social research methods: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
[12] Birchall, J. (2014). Using qualitative inquiry to extract personal narratives in organizational climate change research. Qualitative Report, 19, 1-18. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr
[13] Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Does member checking truly validate research or merely serve as a procedural formality? Qualitative Health Research, 26, 1802-1811.
[14] Black, D., Palombaro, K., & Dole, R. (2013). Student experiences launching a physical therapy pro bono clinic: A qualitative study. Physical Therapy, 93, 637-685.
[15] Blome, C., Schoenherr, T., & Eckstein, D. (2014). How knowledge transfer and complexity affect supply chain flexibility from a knowledge-based perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 307-316.
[16] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2016). Common misunderstandings about thematic analysis and sample size determination. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19, 739-743.
[17] Bromiley, P., & Rau, D. (2016). A critical perspective on operations management through the resource-based view lens. Journal of Operations Management, 41, 95-106.
[18] Brutus, S., Aguinis, H., & Wassmer, U. (2013). Analyzing self-reported limitations and future research directions in academic studies. Journal of Management, 39, 48-75.
[19] Cairney, P., & Denny, E. (2015). Defining qualitative research and qualitative interviewing methods. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 18, 117-125.
[20] Campbell, J. M., & Park, J. (2017). How community-oriented strategic planning affects small business performance: Extending the resource-based view. Journal of Retailing & Consumer Services, 34, 302-308.
[21] Candy, V., & Gordon, J. (2011). Tracing the historical evolution of strategic planning theories. International Journal of Management & Information Systems, 15, 71-89.
[22] Chandler, J. (2013). Seven fundamental principles of market research. International Journal of Market Research, 5, 627-650.
[23] Colorafi, K. J., & Evans, B. (2016). Using qualitative descriptive methods in health science research. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 9, 16-25.
[24] Cope, D. G. (2014). Understanding credibility and trustworthiness in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41, 89-91.
[25] Cronin, C. (2014). Applying case study research as a rigorous methodology. Nurse Researcher, 21, 19-27.
[26] Davis, P. J., & Simpson, E. (2017). Using resource-based theory to leverage employees for competitive advantage in African firms. American Journal of Management, 17, 19-33. http://www.na-businesspress.com/ajmopen.html
[27] De Massis, A., & Kotlar, J. (2014). Guidelines for using case study methodology in family business research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5, 15-29.
[28] Decker, R., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R., & Miranda, J. (2014). How entrepreneurship drives job creation and economic growth in the United States. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28, 3-24.
[29] Derobertmasure, A., & Robertson, J. E. (2014). Analyzing code sequences in teacher training data using QDA Miner software. Quality & Quantity, 48, 2255-2276.
[30] Ensari, M. S. (2016). Factors influencing competitive strategies among small and medium enterprises in Turkey. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 7, 73-80. http://www.ijbssnet.com
[31] First Research (2018). Industry profile: Fast food and quick service restaurants. http://mergent.firstresearch-learn.com/industry_full.aspx?pid=433
[32] Fugard, A. J., & Potts, H. W. (2015). A quantitative tool for determining sample sizes in thematic analysis research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18, 669-684.
[33] Fung, V. K., Fung, W. K., & Wind, Y. J. R. (2007). Strategies for competing in a globalized, borderless economy. Pearson Prentice Hall.
[34] Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Determining when data saturation has been achieved in qualitative research. Qualitative Report, 20, 1408-1416. http://nsuworks.nova.edu
[35] Gentles, S., & Vilches, S. (2017). Toward a shared understanding of sampling terminology in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1-7.
[36] Gheondea-Eladi, A. (2014). Examining the generalizability of qualitative research findings. Journal of Community Positive Practices, 14, 114-124. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=466281
[37] Gibbons, R., & Kaplan, R. S. (2015). Can formal performance measures transform informal organizational culture? American Economic Review, 105, 447-451.
[38] Greene, P., Brush, C., & Brown, T. (2015). An exploratory study of resource utilization in small firms. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 8, 25-40. http://www.jsbs.org
[39] Guo, X., & Guo, X. (2016). A panel data analysis of air pollution, economic growth, and industrial structure in China. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 52, 1315-1324.
[40] Hancock, D. R., & Algozzine, B. (2015). A practical guide to case study research for beginning researchers. Teachers College Press.
[41] Harvey, L. (2015). Moving beyond member checking: A dialogic approach to research interviews. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38, 23-38.
[42] Hatten, K. J., & Hatten, M. L. (1987). Strategic groups, mobility barriers, and market contestability. Strategic Management Journal, 8, 329-342.
[43] Heyns, M. M., & Kerr, M. D. (2018). How different generations are motivated in the workplace. South African Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 1-10.
[44] Hovhannisyan, N., & Keller, W. (2015). Does international business travel stimulate innovation? Journal of Economic Growth, 20, 75-104.
[45] IBIS World (2018). Industry market research reports and statistics. https://www.ibisworld.com
[46] Ibrahim, A. B. (2015). An empirical investigation of how strategy types affect small firm performance. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 4, 13-22. http://www.jsbs.org
[47] Jardon, C. M. (2016). How human capital drives innovation in subsistence small businesses. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 11, 59-66.
[48] Joslin, R., & Müller, R. (2016). Using philosophical and methodological triangulation to identify significant project phenomena. International Journal of Project Management, 34, 1043-1056.
[49] Kellermanns, F., Walter, J., Crook, R., Kemmerer, B., & Narayanan, V. (2016). Comparing researcher and entrepreneur perspectives on the resource-based view in entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 54, 26-48.
[50] Kenny, M. (n.d.a). Understanding timestamp features in Temi transcripts. https://help.temi.com/editing-transcripts/do-the-temi-transcripts-have-timestamps
[51] Kenny, M. (n.d.b). Accuracy rates and expectations for automated transcription services. https://help.temi.com/editing-transcripts/do-the-temi-transcripts-have-timestamps
[52] Kongolo, M. (2010). The relationship between job creation, job loss, and SME contributions to economic development. African Journal of Business Management, 4, 2288-2295. http://www.academicjournals.org/AJBM
[53] Lensges, M. L., Hollensbe, E. C., & Masterson, S. S. (2016). How shifting employee identification affects organizational restructuring outcomes. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25, 382-396.
[54] López-Cabarcos, M. á., Gottling-Oliveira-Monteiro, S., & Vázquez-Rodríguez, P. (2015). How business strategy mediates the relationship between organizational capabilities and profitability. SAGE Open, 5, 1-13.
[55] MacGregor, J., & Wathen, N. (2014). A qualitative exploration of personal health management within the context of new public health imperatives. BioMed Central Public Health, 14, Article No. 726.
[56] Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research: A comprehensive guide (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
[57] Mathooko, F. M., & Ogutu, M. (2015). How Porter’s five forces framework influences strategy selection in Kenyan public universities. International Journal of Educational Management, 29, 334-354.
[58] Memili, E., Fang, H., Chrisman, J. J., & De Massis, A. (2015). The economic growth impact of small and medium-sized family businesses. Small Business Economics, 45, 771-785.
[59] Morse, J. M. (2015). A critical examination of rigor determination strategies in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 25, 1212-1222.
[60] Nelson, J., Clark, T., & Stewart, I. (2018). Augmenting intuition with cognitive computing, analytics, and artificial intelligence. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/50522
[61] Ody-Brasier, A., & Vermeulen, F. (2014). How price-setting responds to norm violations in the champagne grape market. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59, 109-144.
[62] Oh, C., Lee, T., Kim, Y., Park, S., & Suh, B. (2017). Public fear of artificial intelligence: Lessons from the Google DeepMind challenge match. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2523-2534). ACM Press.
[63] Olubunmi, O. A., Timothy, I. O., Alabi, A. O., & Israel, O. T. (2014). Competitive strategies used by quantity surveying firms in Nigeria. International Journal of Management, Information Technology and Engineering, 2, 1-18. https://journal-index.org/index.php/asi/article/view/2393
[64] Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Byers, V. T. (2014). A model for integrating verbal and nonverbal data in qualitative research. International Journal of Education, 6, 183-246.
[65] Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to benefit from platform strategies. WW Norton & Company.
[66] Parsa, H. G., van der Rest, J. P. I., Smith, S. R., Parsa, R. A., & Bujisic, M. (2015). The relationship between demographic factors and restaurant failure rates (Part IV). Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 56, 80-90.
[67] Penrose, E. T. (1959). A theoretical framework for understanding firm growth. Oxford University Press.
[68] Porter, M. E. (1980). Methods for analyzing industries and competing firms. The Free Press.
[69] Porter, M. E. (2008). The five forces that shape competitive strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86, 25-40. https://hbr.org
[70] Porter, M. E. (2011). How nations build and sustain competitive advantage. Simon and Schuster.
[71] Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2017). The economic and social development role of small businesses and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29, 1-3.
[72] Robinson, O. C. (2014). A theoretical and practical guide to sampling in interview-based qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11, 25-41.
[73] Self, J. T., Jones, M. F., & Botieff, M. (2015). A longitudinal study of how micro-location factors contribute to restaurant failure. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 18, 328-340.
[74] Silverman, D. (2013). A practical handbook for conducting qualitative research. Sage Publications.
[75] Simatupang, T. M., Piboonrungroj, P., & Williams, S. J. (2017). The evolution of value chain thinking in business management. International Journal of Value Chain Management, 8, 40-57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314113230
[76] Singh, R. P., & Gibbs, S. R. (2013). How Black entrepreneurs identify and recognize business opportunities. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 26, 643-659.
[77] Stephan, U., Patterson, M., Kelly, C., & Mair, J. (2016). An integrative review of how organizations drive positive social change. Journal of Management, 42, 1250-1281.
[78] Tchamyou, V. S. (2017). The contribution of knowledge economy to African business development. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8, 1189-1228.
[79] Teece, D. J. (2000). Strategic and policy dimensions of intellectual capital management. University Press.
[80] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) (2014). How the leisure and hospitality industry recovered from the recent employment downturn. https://www.restaurants-help-feed-job-growth.pdf/
[81] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) (2015). Survival rates of private sector establishments by opening year. https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2015/home.htm
[82] U.S. Census Bureau (USCB) (2015). County business patterns for sector 722513 (2015). https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cbp.html
[83] U.S. Census Bureau (USCB) (2016). County business patterns for sector 722513 (2016). https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/2016/econ/cbp/2016-cbp.html
[84] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) (1979). Ethical principles and guidelines for human subjects research (The Belmont Report). http://www.hhs.gov
[85] U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) (2016). Financial management and funding sources for small businesses. https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/Finance-FAQ-2016_WEB.pdf
[86] U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) (2018a). Common reasons why businesses cease operations. https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/Small_Biz_Facts_Why_Do_Businesses_Close_May_2018.pdf
[87] U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) (2018b). Recent developments and trends in small business. https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/Whats-New-With-Small-Business-2018.pdf
[88] Wahyuni, D. (2012). Navigating research design: Understanding paradigms, cases, methods, and methodologies. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 10, 69-80. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2103082
[89] Wamba, S. F., Akter, S., Edwards, A., Chopin, G., & Gnanzou, D. (2015). The transformative potential of big data: Insights from a systematic review and longitudinal case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 165, 234-246.
[90] Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based perspective on firm strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.
[91] Woods, K. (2019). How university students perceive generational differences in professional workplace settings. Journal of Leadership Education, 18, 102-115.
[92] Woods, M., Paulus, T., Atkins, D. P., & Macklin, R. (2016). The gap between potential and practice in qualitative data analysis software use (1994-2013). Social Science Computer Review, 34, 597-617.
[93] Yang, Y., Lee, P. K., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2016). How continuous improvement and employee creativity affect new service development from a frontline perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 275-288.
[94] Yilmaz, K. (2013). A comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological distinctions. European Journal of Education, 48, 311-325.
[95] Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
[96] Zamawe, F. C. (2015). Practical implications of using NVivo software for qualitative data analysis. Malawi Medical Journal, 27, 13-15.
[97] Zitomer, M. R., & Goodwin, D. (2014). Assessing quality standards in qualitative adapted physical activity research. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 31, 193-218.
[98] Zulu-Chisanga, S., Boso, N., Adeola, O., & Oghazi, P. (2016). The pathway from firm innovativeness to financial performance: The role of new product success and market responsiveness. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 26, 51-67. http://www.jsbs.org
